Chuck Norris advocating sedition?
The only people who would actively advocate an "armed insurrection" are those who 1) have nothing to lose, 2) just like killing and maiming, or 3) are nuts. Mr. Norris probably doesn't fit the first category, and may fit the second. He certainly seems to be freaking nuts, though.
Here's the sentiment from the blog post, and I agree:
The burning question we all face is what the Obama administration will do to cope with those that promote violence and armed insurrection against our own country. We don’t need a “civil war” or any other type of violence that disembodies our Constitution, the Rule of Law, and the Bill of Rights. Those who believe that violence is the only way to display their dissatisfaction with he Obama administration are committing treason - in my opinion - and I don’t seem to be the only one that share this belief.I don't want to live in the Fascist States of What-Once-Was-America. There's a lot wrong, right now, and I'm not convinced this massive bailout is the right thing to do, but taking up guns to overthrow the government doesn't sound like a good idea. We need less polarization, not more.
I think he'd better watch it. He could be the first martyr of the failed wingnut "revolution." Most Americans are sheep, and I can say "baah" as well as anyone. It's called protective coloration.


0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home